See, that is where I think smoker's logic is flawed. They feel that their right to smoke (and produce second hand smoke) outweighs the rights of those who do not want to breathe that second hand smoke. I see it as the opposite, and did when I smoked.
Why is it OK to have that attitude on a personal level, but not a corporate one? If you do not want to live near factories spewing smoke into the air, then you can remove yourself from that situation? If you do not want to live near high tension power lines, remove yourself from that situation. On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS] <[email protected]>wrote: > > I will grant you that, but if you agree that a smoker had a right to > smoke, > > than common sense would dictate that you would agree a non-smoker has a > > right to not breathe second-hand smoke. > > Well non-smokers do have the right not to breathe in second-hand smoke. > Technically it's your choice to stay in a situation where there is second > hand smoke, and it's also your choice to breathe in that situation. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283533 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
