Just to clarify, are you attributing the .com bubble to the Clinton administration? (or any politicians for that matter)
I always thought it was more a recipe of 1 part novelty, 1 part investor ignorance, 2 parts greed and a splash silicon. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Munn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:29 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Obama's vision of a better world - a Power Couple for the white house The morons at Media Matters don't seem to understand the plain meaning of the word inherit in this context. The recession began a month into Bush's first term. Nothing significant changed between January and March, 2001. The events that led to the recession - the banking crises, the dot com bubble, the stock market bubble - all happened during the Clinton Administration. In the summer of 2000, everyone knew the party was over, it was only a question of when the recession would actually hit. On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Vive wrote: > This statement is patently false: > "Bush inherited a recession" > > He did not. > > Please provide evidence, outside of the Bush camp, which shows that he > inherited a recession. > > http://mediamatters.org/items/200405010002 > > "In March 2001, the U.S. economy went into recession for the first time in > ten years ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:284430 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
