> gMoney wrote: > I'm telling you, I really think it's the 'ick' factor. > OR....a group that they secretly have more in common with > then they'd like to admit, lets not forget about this contingent. >
I think you're exactly right. Plus I'd add I think there are a group of people just plain see it as an aberration. For them it's like allowing public voluntary amputations. It's "not normal" So I think the challenge is to define those things that are permissible, but not normal, versus those things that should not be permissible be they normal or not. All of these moral issues have that question attached. E.g., self-mutilation is not normal and not healthy and so not permissible. Gay coupling is not normal ... but is it a healthy function of human biology and therefore permissible? When you strip away the religious morality, that's the ethics of it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294608 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
