I don't see what the problem is with two consenting adults entering into an agreement of responsibility for each other (IE: medical benefits, joint accounts, joint taxes, etc.)
The scenario that I keep seeing is two elderly folks who live together, one would be allowed to make medical decisions for the other, they'd share accounts and be taxed jointly. As a legal entity IMO this type of legal entity is the only thing that the government should recognize, -- Scott Stewart ColdFusion Developer 4405 Oakshyre Way Raleigh, NC 27616 (h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835 -----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:58 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Anybody Here Against Gay Marriage? On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since the whole purpose of forbidding marriage between siblings and > cousins is the probability of a defective child, why would it matter > if gay cousins formed a civil union? Aye caramba! You'd flip the debate in the other direction...now you'd have straights demanding the same marriage rights that gays have! Decide on what marriage is, what it's restrictions are, then apply that evenly to everyone, without regard to race, creed or orientation. -- When the Jazzman's testifyin' A faithless man believes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294647 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
