I do not recall every saying anything about the 'risk'. And it still does not refute anything Michael or I have said.
Just about anything, including roofies, can be benign in low enough doses and just about anything, including water, can be harmful in high enough doses. Regardless of how emotional some of the responses were, there has been nothing in this thread that disproves that statement. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Cameron Childress<camer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Scott Stroz<boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What you are referring to is when these drugs are used in high doses >> and typically over a long period of time. >> >> No one ever said they were benign, merely that in the right doses, >> they can be - there is a big difference there. > > To be fair, the dose required to do damage is lower for some drugs > than others. I would say that the riskiness of a drug is inversely > proportional to the size of dose required to do damage. > > Crack, heroine, roofies, are a low dose required, high risk item. > > Alcohol probably moderate dose required, moderate risk item. > > Water is a high dose required, low risk item. > > -Cameron > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300773 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
