>> Larry wrote: >>>I'll believe Heritage over Judah everyday and so should you >>> >> I would think that Judah is more trustworthy in many of his statements. >> > >But in this case there's no comparison because the Heritage Foundation >has a published methodology and articulated factbase while Judah has >speculation. > >If Heritage has a flawed methodology, then hear why, the right >methodology, and let's see the adjusted numbers. > >Until then their facts stand because, well, they're actual footnoted facts.
Given their prior accuracy if they said it was daylight I'd look outside. As I mentioned they have been caught quite a few times cherry picking their data. Given that heritage (pun intended) I am just very suspect of any report they publish until it is independently verified at least. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302509 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
