>From the article:

Louis Vuitton claimed that Chen and his hosting companies were contributing
to the illegal activities by providing the infrastructure that enabled the
sale of counterfeit goods.* They further said that Chen and his companies
had been informed of the activity by Louis Vuitton but still refused to
implement a policy for removing the offending sites*, which was their
responsibility.


Sounds like the hosting company was informed of the illegal activity
conducted on their servers, and ignored it. If that's true, and a jury has
decided it is, then there is nothing wrong with the judgement.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> http://snurl.com/rjnto
>
> I think that is a very steep, ice covered slope we just stepped onto.
>
> --
> Scott Stroz
> ---------------
> The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who
> are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas
> Jefferson
>
> http://xkcd.com/386/
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303294
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to