I was wondering when someone would be bringing up implicit social cognition. It woudl be far better if the writer could have presented some research on the attitudes of Birthers and their supporters.
That said there was an excellent article about Orly Taitz - one of the "shining lights" of the movement. Says a lot about those who believe in this tripe. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/05/AR2009100503819.html On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "There are those who say that even if Obama were to provide every last > record down to dry-cleaning receipts, no proof could satisfy birther > proponents. In Taitz's case, there's what she calls "a two-prong test." > Bucking the common view that "natural born citizen" the constitutional > requirement for a U.S. president means, generally speaking, born on > American soil, she argues that to be president a person must not only be > born here but must also be the child of parents who were both U.S. citizens > at the time of his birth. She allows that her decidedly non-mainstream > interpretation would knock out her two older sons, born when she had only a > green card, before she became a U.S. citizen." > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=birth-of-a-notion > > Insanity knows no bounds with these people. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:305205 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
