I should clarify, I don't _really_ mean this, was kind of a joke, was
trying to put something out there that shouldn't be written down.
Feel like it could have backfired/been taken wrong.

=)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ray Champagne <r...@raychampagne.com> wrote:
> f*ck you, Casey
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Casey Dougall
> <ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gruss Gott <grussg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > gMoney wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I think that Outlook should come configured so that, when a user hits the
>>> > "Reply to all" button, they are given a warning:
>>>
>>> Dude!  What happened?  Is it epic?
>>>
>>> Once a boss of mine accidentally did a reply-all which included our
>>> client.  In the email he went on to explain how the clients would lose
>>> their balls if they weren't in a sack and that the only reason he even
>>> agreed to take them on was because it was slow quarter.
>>>
>>> They decided to go with someone else.
>>>
>>>
>> Just goes to say... Never write anything that you don't want put out there.
>> Even if it's internal now, it may not be 3 or 4 threads later on replies and
>> forwards.
>>
>> always be nice, you never know where your email is going to go next....
>>
>> Except in cf-community, we abandoned those rules a long time ago in here.
>>
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307558
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to