On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. Nike (so far) has pledged their support. I will agree they may have > a right to know, but that does not translate into the whole world > knowing. > As an equity holder in Nike I demand to know why my money is being spent to sponsor him. I demand details. > > 2. That is a risk you take with sporting events, especially golf > tournaments. Any number of things could prohibit him from playing in > any tournament, and none of them are any of our business, even if you > bought a ticket because he was 'scheduled' to appear. > > No one is writing that these risk do not exist. What I am trying to say is, I want an explanation if he doesn't show up. You say it is none of our business. I'm giving you a reason why it is my business. I paid money to have a chance to see him play. He stated he is withdrawing due to "the incident." I want to know what the incident was. Just saying it isn't my business doesn't make it so. I'm telling you why it is my business. I want a good reason why it isn't my business. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308773 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
