Problem is he's arguing from authority rather than the quality of the data.
In other words, he thinks that because this guy's a "scientist" and cool then he must be right. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:37 PM, denstar <valliants...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Isn't he the guy who thinks the "second hand smoke" link to cancer is bunk? > > How do you feel about "second hand smoke", Rob? > > -- > Study the past, if you would divine the future. > Confucius > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Robert Munn wrote: >> >> An excellent read by a respected scientist at MIT on the complexities of >> climate and the failures of researchers to adequately model them, among >> other things: >> >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308957 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
