Nope, I am saying its opinion what they consider to be 'lie of the
year'. You can scatter facts around an op/ed piece, but that does not
make it NOT op/ed.

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd call it fact-checking, myself. Well, perhaps the "lie of the year" piece
> was opinion. It's hard to see "most untrue" as anything but opinion. But you
> seem to be saying that it's not untrue at all? That it's an opinion that
> there are no death panels?
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> And because people cited it, it makes it more reputable?
>>
>> This was an op/ed piece.
>>
>> Op/ed != news
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Actually that site was cited many times during the election.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Wow.. the St Petersburg Times, I am impressed.
>> >>
>> >> Nothing more than an opinion piece - not really any more news worthy
>> >> content at that link than any threads on this list.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > The votes are in and the results are obvious and don't need a recount,
>> >> > Sara Palin had the lie of the year with her Death Panels comment.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/dec/18/politifact-lie-year-death-panels/
>> >> >
>> >> > I bet all the republican fanbois are frothing at the mouth.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309624
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to