hmm, that actually sounds plausible. objection removed. On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you remember the uproar in the aftermath of Katrina when several > media outlets showed two AP images, one of a whites labeled survivors, > one of a blacks labeled looters? My acquaintance at CNN.com removed > the word looter from the second photo because the people in that photo > had not been vetted as looters. As a result, CNN.com was one of the > few media outlets that did not get caught up in the controversy. That > is the level of care they take with each story since the Tailhook > scand
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314323 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
