Man, how did I miss this. Perfect point. The laws and rights and the constitution in the frame we are discussing them pertain to gov't intrusion, not that of private parties.
</debate> -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:03 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc All of that privacy talk is prohibition on the GOVERNMENT against CITIZENS. It has nothing to do with citizens' privacy from other citizens. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:19 PM, denstar <valliants...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, LRS Scout wrote: > > > > Also the word privacy is never mentioned in the constitution, it's an > > invention of judicial activism. > > So there's something in there saying the government has the right to > invade our privacy? > > I was pretty sure that the idea was, that "we" didn't have to > enumerate all our rights, similar to this guy's take: > > http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/PrivacyRight.htm > > A shorter version by someone else: > > That's what the 10th Amendment is all about - government is strictly > limited to doing those activities which are specifically authorized to > it by the Constitution. > > Everything else is left to "the States, respectively, or to the People." > > No? > > And how does the 4th fit in there? Perhaps the 5th as well? > > :Den ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314461 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
