I don't remember anyone calling him soft on terror, I do remember many calling Bush evil. Obama is just continuing with the Bush strategy and getting called a hero.
You mention drone attacks as a signal Obama is tougher on terror than Bush but is it that simple? Is the bombing helping or making things worse. Could we have done more bombings two years ago? Seems to me it's an illusion, step up bombing, keep the wars going but make nice with terrorists and beg them to be nice. It's not working, the whole "The world will stop hating us" plan failed. Now the question is what's next, does he have a plan B or will he just keep up with the Bush policies? On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Certainly a ballsy move, though if what has been said about this > particular guy is true, it seems like the order would naturally follow > given what else the admin has done. Amazing to think that there have > been more CIA missile strikes in Obama's first year in office than in > the last 3 years of Bush's tenure combined. I'm not entirely sure that > the people we are involving ourselves with in Afghanistan, Pakistan > and Yemen (to name a few) are entirely the wisest choice but I'm > astounded that people can actually think that the Obama admin is "soft > on terror". > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315264 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
