I am all for prosecuting people for engineering the loss of my money, and then setting things up so they profit from that loss.
How someone, especially someone who has lost money, can support this: A) I give money to someone to invest. B) They intentionally and knowingly make bad investments. C) They then simultaneously create instruments so when the bad investments in B fail, they profit. D) The bad investments in B fail, and I lose all my money. It's beyond me how people can still call this 'creative'. It is as "Creative" as the con man who steals money from people, or the robber that notices your door open and sneaks inside your house to steal something and run back out. By that yardstick of 'Creativity' there should be NO law against Fraud, as the victim always should have known better. On 16 April 2010 16:05, Brian Thornton <vegasthorn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yet another approach to go after those who risk for the reward... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316189 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
