On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I do not support warrantless wiretapping. It makes no difference who > is in power.
So when you said eight years you meant from today? Is the current admin pillaging the nation's resources also? I didn't even know we were doing that. You mean like using oil or providing jobs? > It did not work in Obama's favor. Are you sure? It gave the haters fuel. Might have been just enough to change the election results. > Did the kid testify as to his > motivation? At what point does it become not ok to invite a data > breach? He didn't testify at all, but you know that. His roommate testified to his motive. > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Pssst... Dana, you Dope-n-Changers support warrantless wiretapping now >> that the clingers aren't the gatekeepers. >> >> What's interesting is you can't stand the idea of Uncle Sam listening >> in while you chat with al Qaeda, but have no problem with a kid >> publishing a vice-presidential candidates personal emails for the sole >> purpose of influencing a national presidential election. I'm guessing >> because it worked in your favor. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317164 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
