glad to see you parroting the talking points again. What next more copy and past responses?
Point to consider, the fund will be independently administered. But then again as far as you're concerned corporate profit is much more important. On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> so you think its OK for some guy who made his life fishing get >> completely ruined by BP's negligence. > > It's starting to look like WH negligence or at least inaction. > >> At least the escrow fund will >> ensure some reasonable amount of compensation that does not take 20 >> years to receive, like the Exxon Valdez claims for example. > > No it won't. It just means more bureaucracy. > >> I guess you think its OK for a large corporation to destroy >> livelihoods and important ecosystems simply be cause they're large >> multi-national companies. > > Did I say BP shouldn't pay or did I say Obama should follow the laws? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:321667 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
