How about we include areas where dust drifted as well? Or, even better, include the areas where people watched it on TV, that will keep those pesky Muslims out.
I already answered your question. I do not think any of the land/property should be treated differently or special, but would be OK with JUST the land where the towers stood - or maybe even that whole block - beyond that I do not think it should be treated differently. Its obvious we will not see eye to eye on this. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How about the area the building fell on? > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Not everyone...just you (and maybe Larry - based purely on his >> intolerance of you and Bush) ;) >> >> I just don't get why we need to treat the area around Ground Zero as >> almost hallowed ground. I can accept treating Ground Zero itself as >> 'hallowed', though I do not think it should be. >> >> If we treat the surrounding area the same as GRound Zero, once you get >> outside the actual boundaries of where the towers stood, how do you >> quantify how far away is enough? That is what I was asking. How do you >> quantify 4 blocks being OK, but 3.5 blocks not OK? >> >> I really do not think that Ground Zero should be treated any >> differently that any other plot of land in NYC. But if they are going >> to, it should be limited to where the towers stood, and not extend a >> random number blocks in all directions. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325040 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
