You're right. I basically stated that the KGB was a communist agency. It was. I then stated that there were communists caught somewhere in the time since McCarthy. There were. I then asked when a communist spy becomes a non-communist one. So by implication and chain rule, my questioning about the spies caught, implying that they were from the KGB, stating that the KGB was a communist agency, and that communist spies have been captured since McCarthy leads to the spies in question being communist. I'd have to agree with you. Happy now?
I was unaware of the changeover between KGB and SVR or I would have used the new initials. But the SVR isn't communist. They're happy capitalist spies. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > That's still a statement Michael...don't act stupid. > > You don't have to mark the following as being sarcastic...it is pretty > apparent: > >>>You're right. I forgot that the KGB isn't a commie organization >>> anymore. They're free loving capitalists. All of the spies we've found >>> since McCarthy were capitalists too. Even the ones in the State >>> Department. > >>> What's the expiration date when a Commie spy becomes a non-Commie one? > > I think that is pretty apparent. Â Saying that wasn't a statement is pretty > dishonest Michael. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:46 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud? > > > You said that the KGB didn't exist anymore. I asked who the spies > answered to. You could have just said the name of the agency that the > KGB turned into. > >> So who were the spies reporting to? > Question, not a statement. It asks who they are reporting to. > >> Who did we return them to? > Question, not a statement. Asks who we returned them to. > >> Giving an organization different initials doesn't change them. > Statement. The KGB was turned into the agencies I mentioned. If > they've changed is up for debate. > > So which statement says communist? > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> Here you go: >> >> Riiiiight. >> So who were the spies reporting to? Who did we return them to? Giving an >> organization different initials doesn't change them. >> >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Eric Roberts >> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>> >>> KGB doesn't exist anymore... >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] >>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 9:36 PM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud? >>> >>> >>> You're right. I forgot that the KGB isn't a commie organization >>> anymore. They're free loving capitalists. All of the spies we've found >>> since McCarthy were capitalists too. Even the ones in the State >>> Department. >>> >>> The point is that no matter how insane McCarthy was, there were still >>> 'Commie' spies at just about every level of the government at one time >>> or another...except for the capitalist ones. >>> >>> What's the expiration date when a Commie spy becomes a non-Commie one? >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Eric Roberts >>> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> They weren't Communists...so what is your point? >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:58 PM >>>> To: cf-community >>>> Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud? >>>> >>>> >>>> Weren't there a bunch of Russian spies caught a month or so ago. I >>>> guess they get a pass now, right? And their fake passports... >>>> >>>>> I mean reallly, how many Commmies were under your bed this morning? >>>>> Have you outed any hidden Commies from the State Department? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] >> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:18 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud? >> >> >> Read again. Show me where the words "they are communists" appear. >> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Eric Roberts >> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>> >>> You didn't ask Michael...you stated that they were communists and members >> of >>> the non-existant KGB. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] >>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:10 AM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud? >>> >>> >>> While I ASKED about their status as communists and who they answered >>> to, I did not know what happened to the KGB. If you were not so set on >>> insulting me tinfoil hat) and instead decided to be informative, this >>> would not get to the point where you're putting words in my mouth. >>> >>> With you I wonder if it does matter. >> >> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325781 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
