To be fair, it _is_ a solution. Just maybe not a very good one :D On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As for the rest of your argument, it's bullshit. Any of the solutions >> put forward (and I'm sure others out there that haven't been analyzed >> by the CBO and the trust fund board) will adequately fund the program >> for the next 75 years. Is that "forever"? No, but it is as long (or >> longer) than you can reasonably forecast and provides a substantial >> cushion to allow new generations to change things as new situations >> come to light. > > In other words, you propose passing the buck to the next sucker. As I > said, I am not playing that game. That's not a solution, it's > cowardice. > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328416 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
