Any personal information, like names of people, with the exception of heads of state, or specific locations that could compromise security, were redacted. Apparently wikileaks worked with Reuters, Associated Press, and a couple of other big news agencies to ensure that info like that was properly redacted before release.
-----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 15:47 To: cf-community Subject: Re: Well, wikileaks finally lost me On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > They have all been blathering about it, but not able to show one > instance where it actually compromised anything. > Usually by then it's too late. Look, i know the game you are playing, and it's worth playing. The government keeps too many secrets, too many bad secrets, and sometimes...many times.....letting the people know what is REALLY going on is right, and valuable, and good. But there are things that really are VITAL that they be kept under wraps. These are legitimate concerns surrounding personal privacy, and certainly security, of American citizens. Now, i have no idea what all has been compromised in these leaks, and probably no one else on here does either...so none of us can really speak definitively. But can we agree on this: - anything that truly compromised the persona privacy or security of American citizens, should have remained private, and exposing such is probably illegal and should be prosecuted if possible. Do you disagree? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:332485 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
