Your conclusions are wrong. He took it out of the finance bill to get it passed and he did. That brought the idiots back to work and now they can work on the actual monetary portion of the finance bill. In the end it still there to save money they can't afford to pay out.
. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > He took the collective bargaining provision out of the financial bill, > which clearly shows his intent had nothing to do with "saving the > state". The story is all over the net. I don't need to listen to a > bobblehead to get the info. I used teach logic. I don't have a hard > time understanding it and drawing my own conclusions. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335082 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
