sweet! im crazy. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Greg Morphis <gmorp...@gmail.com> wrote: > You got it then, you're crazy if you think they're hand in hand related.. > There was a massive solar flare just last month, did it trigger an earth > quake? > > X-Rated Solar Flare > > Monday's blast was the first X-level solar flare since December 2006X being > the highest level of the flare-rating system. > > But at X2.2or 0.00022 watts per square meterthe Valentine's Day flare > wasn't unexpectedly powerful. > > "It fits in just perfect" with forecasts that show the sun entering a period > of increased activity, Pesnell said. > > The recent explosion, he added, has nothing on the giant blasts of the early > 2000s. That most recent active period spawned the biggest solar flare on > ever directly measured in November 2003a blast more than ten times as > powerful as Monday's. > > Compared to that "big honker," he said, this week's flare "is pretty > typicalexcept it was beautifully typical, because we saw it with SDO." > > Here's your neutrino: > > Emmerich opted to used one of the most unlikely candidates to kill Earth. > After all, the neutrino is electrically neutral and it has minuscule mass. > Also, the sun pumps out a lot of neutrinos -- the human body is bathed in50 > trillion solar neutrinos every second -- and just as many neutrinos can be > found entering the Earth's crust on the sun-facing side of our planet as > there are on the opposite side. The ghostly particles pass through our > planet totally unimpeded. > > They are extremely weakly interacting particles that have zero effect on our > everyday lives. They are very useful to scientists however, and many > billions of dollars have been spent worldwide on building neutrino detectors > that can sense distant supernovae. > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Ras Tafari <rastaf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> well... color me crazy... but... >> >> 1. major, massive solar flares have been ramping up, right? >> 2. those coronal mass ejections send out lots of little neutrino's and >> other pieces of energy that we really dont know how they affect things >> (all the way) >> 3. we've had more large quakes, etc in recent memory, than i can >> recall in recent history, right? >> >> im just sayin... >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Greg Morphis <gmorp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > No the Sun would have NO effect on the quakes, volcanoes or anything >> > else >> > like that. However I have a theory myself.. March 10th was Chuck >> > Norris's >> > birthday. And that could explain everything. Seriously though.. a solar >> > flare is not going to cause an earthquake.. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> There was a major class X1.5 solar flare on March 9, which is when the >> >> first large quake of this swarm, a 7.2, hit Japan. >> >> http://www.space.com/30-amazing-sun-photos-space.htm >> >> >> >> There was a also a NEO (1.6 LD) on the 11th. >> >> http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ >> >> >> >> >> >> There is also a supermoon on the 19th, but scientists claim no >> >> causation for the earthquake: >> >> >> >> http://www.space.com/11105-supermoon-didnt-trigger-japan-earthquake.html >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Ras Tafari <rastaf...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > so, does the theory of sun emissions that we have had lately, explain >> >> > these quakes, volcanoes, etc >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335084 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
