okee *shrugs* On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I go with the creds. > > If you continue to read a source that's always wrong then you have a > problem. If you read a source that's proven again and again to be > closest to the mark then you tend to trust it more. I have several of > these. Many on this list used to swear by Michael Moore. After many > years of being wrong most people don't rely on him anymore. > Unfortunately, some still do. > > So you say "clear cynical right leaning bias" I say correct analysis > more often than not. > > . > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Medic <hofme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Of course your opinion can be one that aligns with the right and be > solely > > yours. I come to my opinion about you based on the sources and the spin > it > > seems you push. It seems to me you'll say something extremely cynical of > > something left leaning, then post a link to a site or news source with > very > > clear cynical right leaning bias. So to the casual observer it looks like > > it's the source that structures your opinion. > > > > And I never called you an idiot. > > It's always implied when you tell someone their told what to think. > > . > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335677 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
