> If I point out the flaws in your position without questioning your > right to have a position, I'm questioning your policies. There is no question as to the right to a position. The question is what the difference is between position and character is.
> If I call you a fool or question your birth status because I disagree > with your position, I'm attacking your character. According to this someone can only be called a fool for character, not position. I disagree. Someone can be a fool for either or both. > If I label you a secret Muslim who has no right to an opinion on > American policy and is trying to destroy this country. then that would > be racist. No one is talking about the right to an opinion, we're talking about the difference between position and character. As for Obama being a secret Muslim, his massive ignorance as to the Muslim cultural mindset shows him not to be one at all. > There have been numerous statements you've made over the years with > which I vehemently disagree. Never once in all those years have I > attacked you because of your ethnicity or religion. I appreciate that but it doesn't answer the question about the difference between policy and character. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Michael Dinowitz > <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: >> >> Where's the line between policy and character? If he's a fool on a matter >> of >> diplomacy, which is it? >> >> They aren't criticizing the President's policy. They are smearing his >>> character, and denying his citizenship and religion > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:337252 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
