I did. You think since she's not the head of her house she can't be the head of government. You also seem to think being a submissive wife means she's subservient. That may be the case with some folks but I don't believe it to be so with her.
I often recommend my wife to continue with her education and she agrees but does not. That second income could really help. That wouldn't make her a bad leader, maybe not heading my advice does. I'm not a Christian but a quick search on submissive to your husband does not appear to link to slavery. . On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Justin Scott <leviat...@darktech.org> wrote: > >> So it's the female thing. Got it. > > Read into it what you like, but if a male candidate came out and > implied he'd be a puppet for his wife to control, I'd take just as > much issue with that. It just so happens that she claims to interpret > the Bible in a way that supports a belief that women should be > submissive and do whatever their husbands say. Frankly, that kind of > deference is not a quality I want to see in the President. The actual > gender of the candidate makes no difference to me, but who they claim > they will defer to in matters of importance matters a great deal. > > > -Jus ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339894 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
