The leak has no value, it doesn't mean anything. Or did I miss something.
. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > You mean like Oppenheimer, or several other American and immigrant > scientists who were grilled by the HUAC. > > I can see why Gleick initially leaked the docs anonymously. You know > such things as fear for your job etc. > > That said, he had the honesty and integrity enough to admit leaking > the docs . Other scientists, like Richard Muller who was a long time > critic of AGM had the integrity to admit his data followed the > commonly accepted model. > > How many of the right wing who trumpet the "GREAT GLOBAL WARMING > CONSPIRACY" and its associated bullship would do the same? The one > semi prominent denier I personally know probably would not. The > limbaughs, becks etc would not. In fact I cannot think of one who > would. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347216 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
