On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Medic <hofme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Did she say the money was for condoms or contraception? > > It seems to me she's likely choosing a number that would cover whatever > form of contraception was chosen. Pill/patch/condoms/IUD. $1000/yr might be > completely reasonable for the pill in America ( I don't know if it is or > not.) And that needs to be taken daily regardless of sexual activity to be > effective. Condoms aren't particularly reliable so many women choose other > means, and rightly so as it's their choice to make. It seems to me Rush is > the only one who's said condoms and then set up a straw man to make silly > claims about how much sex this person must be having.
The bill is $10 a month at Walmart What's the other $70 for? > I really am shocked that this is even a talking point for anyone. It's to deflect from the real topic. > Hey insurance companies: Cover birth control. Cover Viagra and Cialis. The > more sex you're clients have the less health problems they will have. Happy > horny people have less stress and better health. Hell, consider also paying > for a baby sitter and dinner so mom's and dad's can find time to make the > double-backed beast too. Give them all $1000 worth of pr0n while you're at > it. It's a hell of a lot cheaper than a hospital visit. Then why are they making new laws? . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347879 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
