In what shouldn't be a surprise to anyone with a pulse

Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush (
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/growth-of-income-inequality-is-worse-under-obama-than-bush.html)

Yesterday, the President gave a speech in which he demanded that Congress
raise taxes on millionaires, as a way to somewhat recalibrate the nation’s
wealth distribution.  His advisors, like Gene Sperling, are giving speeches
talking about the need for manufacturing.  A common question in DC
is whether this populist pose will help him win the election.  Perhaps it
will.  Perhaps not.  Romney is a weak candidate, cartoonishly wealthy and
from what I’ve seen, pretty inept.  But on policy, there’s a more
interesting question.

A better puzzle to wrestle with is why President Obama is able to continue
to speak as if his administration has not presided over a significant
expansion of income redistribution upward.  The data on inequality shows
that his policies are not incrementally better than those of his
predecessor, or that we’re making progress too slowly, as liberal Democrats
like to argue.  It doesn’t even show that the outcome is the same as
Bush’s.  No, look at this table, from Emmanuel Saez (h/t Ian Welsh).  Check
out those two red circles I added.
...
Chart here
...
Yup, under Bush, the 1% captured a disproportionate share of the income
gains from the Bush boom of 2002-2007.  They got 65 cents of every dollar
created in that boom, up 20 cents from when Clinton was President.  Under
Obama, the 1% got 93 cents of every dollar created in that boom.  That’s
not only more than under Bush, up 28 cents.  In the transition from Bush to
Obama, inequality got worse, faster, than under the transition from Clinton
to Bush.  Obama accelerated the growth of inequality.

Income concentrations are relatively rare, but when they happen, sharp
policy moves can retain a strong measure of equality.  It’s well-known at
this point that President Obama did not want to make such moves.  TARP,
cramdown, and the foreclosure fraud settlement suggest that his interests
lie in preserving the capital structure of the large banks.  What about
other policy priorities?

Despite his recent speech, President Obama knows that his income tax
proposal is going nowhere.  So let’s look at three recent policy choices
that are going somewhere.

1) President Obama is on the verge of approving a Free Trade deal with
Colombia, despite the murder of union organizers in that country.  Not
content with establishing similar deals with Panama (which has to do with
enlarging tax havens) and South Korea, the administration is now
embarking on a much vaster Trans-Pacific Partnership deal with countries
all over Asia.  And it’s being negotiated entirely in secret, with
corporate and government officials the only ones allow to be in the room.
 Trade is a significant driver of lower wages.

2) President Obama just pushed for and signed the JOBS Act, which is a
substantial relaxation of regulations and accounting requirements on
corporations seeking to go public.  Bill Black has many four letter words
to describe this bill, but it’s basically a license for Wall Street to
commit fraud in the equity markets.  The SEC is beginning to promulgate
instructions on how this will work.

3) President Obama just refused to issue an executive order forcing
campaign spending disclosure by government contractors.  President Obama
actually criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United at a
State of the Union address, but as with yesterday’s speech on raising taxes
on millionaires, there was actually no there there.


Read more at the link.


J

-

I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody. -
B

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:349815
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to