then why are they still going through Afghanistan? Just asking. I mean they are, right? Looked like it to me based on the Wikipedia article. And yes yes I realize there are better sources.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com>wrote: > > It actually cheaper to build the pipeline around Afghanistan. The > story about the oil pipeline has always been just that a story. > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > Mineral resources plus they wanted to build a pipeline through > > Afghanistan...so yes...oil ;-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:01 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Greed was the motive. Revenge was the justification. Bush's trifecta. > >> > > > > Greed for what??? Certainly not money...they had none. No oil. No > industry. > > No nothing. I fail to see what we were so greedy over in Afghanistan...? > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:351392 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
