>"The agency revealed last week that an FBI undercover team had 
> eavesdropped on more than 5,000 phone calls to the brothel over the 
> past year, and as a result it has indicted the two women and 12 
> prostitutes on conspiracy and racketeering charges.
>   
> The most shocking bit of information to emerge: On September 11, the 
> day terrorists commandeered four airliners and crashed them into the 
> World Trade Center and the Pentagon, FBI agents were conducting an 
> "investigation" by eavesdropping as hookers arranged sexual liaisons, 
> according to the Washington Post. Even worse, agents continued 
> monitoring the brothel after the 9/11 attacks, Dasbach noted.
> 
> "Americans should be appalled that at the moment a team of terrorists 
> murdered 3,000 innocent people, a team of FBI agents was busy 
> protecting people from sex," Dasbach said. "This is clear and 
> convincing evidence that the FBI's priorities are downright dangerous. 
> At a time when terrorists are planning further attacks on Americans, 
> deploying even one agent to spy on hookers is a threat to national 
> security."
> 
> The FBI obtained wiretap authority 13 months ago by claiming the 
> bordello was involved in mob dealings and illegal drug transactions - 
> yet no such evidence ever surfaced, Dasbach said.
>  
> "The same agency that quashed an effort to search the computer of the 
> suspected 20th hijacker, Zacarias Moussaoui, had no problem getting a 
> warrant to listen to dirty phone calls," Dasbach pointed out. "Why was 
> the FBI more vigilant about voyeurism than about terrorism?"

*chuckle*
Yeah yeah..this is a bit of propaganda, but it's still mildly amusing.

-Gel



______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to