interesting blog piece. I agree with most of it. One example of the current republican party approach that is very telling is to consider this, in the 1970's almost 2/3rds of all scientists were Republicans. Now its less than 6%. Most of the scientists interviewed for the last AAAS survey of this kind listed the current republican party anti-science attitude (e.g., support for such dubious things as creationism etc) as the primary reason.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > like the blog name. > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We can probably predict (with frightening accuracy) how some on this list >> will respond to this, but I thought it was an interesting read. >> >> This kind of goes along with some comments made in various threads - most >> notably by Jerry Barnes. >> >> *http://*bit.ly/WFjOtM >> >> >> -- >> Scott Stroz >> --------------- >> You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder >> what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris >> >> http://xkcd.com/386/ >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357986 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
