False...the Dick act does not forbid gun control, Maybe you need to read it again?
-----Original Message----- From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 4:12 PM To: cf-community Subject: RE: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control The dick act actall prohibits gun control, creates the national guard and allows it to be federalized, and creates the state defense forces, state only, non-deployable aka the real militia. You should probably read laws before quoting them. On Jan 10, 2013 5:03 PM, "Eric Roberts" <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > State's national guard...aka the militia as per the Militia Act of > 1903 (aka the Dick Act) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:13 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control > > > In the hands of the police, military and the state's National Guard. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:03 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Right, so you agree then that they can certainly be useful. > > On Jan 10, 2013 10:56 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <larrycly...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> because its smaller and less awkward to deal with in enclosed spaces. > >> Notice that they also haul out the shotguns or rifles when needed. > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hand gun are not unnecesary. Why do the military and law > >> > enforcement > >> carry > >> > them? Security guards? > >> > > >> > Concealable firearms are in many instances far more useful than > >> > long > >> guns. > >> > On Jan 10, 2013 10:05 AM, "GMoney" <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> OK. > >> >> > >> >> Outlaw the import, sale, manufacture and possession of hand guns. > >> >> > >> >> In the near term, only criminals will have hand guns...the rest > >> >> of us > >> will > >> >> have shot guns or rifles or whatever brand of assault rifle we > >> >> see > fit. > >> As > >> >> the years go by, the number of hand guns will decrease to the > >> >> point > >> where > >> >> they are relatively rare. > >> >> > >> >> I don't pretend that there is any solution that represents a > >> >> panacea. I just know that hand guns are unnecessary, serve no > >> >> purpose other than to aid criminals, we'd be better off without > >> >> them, the status quo is unacceptable, and any short term pain > >> >> required to make things better in > >> the > >> >> long run...is worth it, in my opinion. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > So, dispute it. > >> >> > > >> >> > . > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Larry C. Lyons < > >> larrycly...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > can you parrot any other NRA talking point, I mean try for a > >> trifecta > >> >> > > here. Really Sam, ever try for anything original? That > >> >> > > argument is > >> so > >> >> > > cliched and old that its collecting social security. If > >> >> > > that's the best you can do why are you here? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360080 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
