how is a rag for business a scientific peer reviewed journal? You'll have to do better than that Sam.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus > Scientific consensus is not by itself a scientific argument, and it is not > part of the scientific method< > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method> > . > > Global Warming Consensus Looking More Like A Myth > > Read More At Investor's Business Daily: > > http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021513-644725-geoscientists-engineers-dont-believe-in-climate-change.htm > < > http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021513-644725-geoscientists-engineers-dont-believe-in-climate-change.htm#ixzz2QBcAVbwx > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:50 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The majority of respected scientific study. The breadth of knowledge. The > > hypothesis with most supporting evidence through research and study. > > > > How else would anyone define it??? Pretty simple concept really. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > As soon as you define scientific consensus. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:20 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I believe what scientific study suggests is the most likely. Sam, > when > > > you > > > > present me with a CONSENSUS scientific set of conclusions that > suggest > > > the > > > > most likely scenario is that increased global warming is NOT human > > > > caused...I will gladly agree with you. > > > > > > > > Can you do that? > > > > > > > > My devotion is not ideological, it is practical..it is > scientific...it > > is > > > > logical. I don't give two shits about conservatives or liberals, rush > > > > limbaugh or george soros. I don't care who wins politically with > global > > > > warming. Don't care. I have no religion. > > > > > > > > Give me science, and I'm on your team. > > > > > > > > I eagerly await your response...because it would REALLY be good news > if > > > the > > > > current science says this GW scare was all for not. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And here I'm thinking you have to be ignorant to still believe the > > > > religion > > > > > of global warming. > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All you have to do to know why Barton doesn't believe in climate > > > change > > > > > is > > > > > > to look at his campaign contributors. They pay him to be this > > > > ignorant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00005656&cycle=2012 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Marlon Moyer < > > > marlon.mo...@gmail.com > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This wouldn't be the first dumb thing Joe Barton has said > either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/republican-congressman-cites-biblical-great-flood-to-say-cim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362641 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
