The Virgin Mary or Mary Magdalene? Because the latter was a whore and I'm sure she'd be down.
Sent from my iPhone 4S. > On Nov 7, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Now....if > we're talking Mary... > > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> You don't know what you're missing! >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> Not into threesomes thanks. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <jmi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> who gets the middle spot? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> not from a religious point of view....marriage is a triad. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons < >> larrycly...@gmail.com >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not, I think that he's wrong in his first assumption and goes >>>>> downhill >>>>>> from there. Marriage is between 2 entities not 3., unless that's >>> legal >>>>>> whereever they're getting married. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:23 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The religious view of marriage, for most Christian religion >> anyway, >>>> is >>>>>> that >>>>>>> marriage is a representation of the pure and unconditional love >>> from >>>>> God, >>>>>>> exhibited by man here on earth. They see it as a gift from God, >> and >>>> in >>>>>> it's >>>>>>> existence, a celebration of Him and his love. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So.....these comments aren't really all that out of line with >> that >>>>>> belief. >>>>>>> Feel free to find that silly, I certainly do, but I don't see any >>>> point >>>>>> in >>>>>>> mocking someone who holds those beliefs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Larry C. Lyons < >>>> larrycly...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting that this particular Christianist left comments >>>>> disabled. I >>>>>>>> guess that he didn't want any feedback from those who may >>> disagree >>>>> with >>>>>>>> him. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> somehow that fits. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < >>>>>>>> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> http://triathletewithacollar.wordpress.com/2013/11/03/a-response-to-marriage-isnt-for-you/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Undoubtedly you've seen the "Marriage isn't for you" article >>>>> floating >>>>>>>>> around the inter-tubes. I thought that one was kind of >> sappy, >>>> but >>>>> at >>>>>>>> least >>>>>>>>> I could see the point of it. Of course there's going to be >>>> someone >>>>>> who >>>>>>>>> just can't be happy with that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The thing that cracks me up about this one is when he says >> that >>>>> "you >>>>>>>>> challenge your spouse to better love God even when it makes >>> them >>>>>>>> unhappy". >>>>>>>>> -- Spoken like a true male chauvinist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:368438 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
