Or maybe actually fix the system, remove the third party impediments, reduce the ratio back to 1:35,000.
Kill all the lifetime benefits to office, implement real ethical oversight, return as much control over these men back to the states as possible. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com>wrote: > > A lot of the issue of losing the house has more to do with how the 36 > repulican controlled legislatures have gerrymandered their states to ensure > that more republicans are sent to congress than democrats. You want to see > real representation, get the district apportionment out of the hands of > partisan actors and into a neutral or bipartisan third group. > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > That's also what I thought. > > The democrats are probably overrepresented on Linked In. > > > > Either way, it is not a comforting thought. > > To have such an advantage in expertise, and to still lose the House and > > certain jurisdictions? > > > > > > > > On 20 December 2013 21:46, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ability to properly use LinkedIn: > > > Democrat: 90% > > > Republican: 10% > > > > > > -Cameron > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369058 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
