:) Ok if they aren't poor bastards what are they? Keeping in mind poor bastards is pretty much the same as poor souls its just another saying. And #1 you make sure you can get water to level that have their water pipes severed to the ground. So you have water in several reservoirs throughout the building, allowing you to cover areas in the event of middle of the building hit. You could also use retardants etc etc.
Its not unrealistic, its improbable but its defiantly do able. The WTC was build to withstand the hit of a 707 which was way smaller then the planes that hit but to a degree it would have taken the burning but the sprinklers were knocked out. Its just a matter of planning that's all. Don't get all fired up. Think about it :) whatever that means just following your lead Bill Wheatley Senior Database Developer Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer EDIETS.COM 954.360.9022 X159 ICQ 417645 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vinny A DiDonato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: Re: CNN/WTC was Re: CNN now charging for video > I think the idea of creating any building impervious to an attack similar to > what happened on 9/11 is unrealistic. How in the world would you prevent an > object as large as a 7-fricking-47 moving at speeds in excess of 500mph from > destroying a building? Oh, and the 747 probably has thousands of gallons of > jet-fuel to add to the problem. > > And I don't think I'd classify the poor souls who were trapped in the upper > levels during the fires as "poor bastards". Just my two cents. Think about > it. > > -V > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:42 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: CNN/WTC was Re: CNN now charging for video > > > Yea its sad, ;) after Pearl harbor did we leave The base ruined did we leave > those battleships on the bottom of the ocean nope. > > We put our sadness behind us lifted those babies out of the ocean, rebuild > the damage. But I suppose its right I mean it is a risk to work in a > building like that, but I think this time they will build anything with the > ability to withstand a 747 hitting it. Better safety, water supply system > at several points in the building so you cant severe water supply by > severing the water lines in the building. > But some people will have the stigma of it all still, and won't work in the > building. I cant say I blame them I don't know if I could do it. > They should figure some way so that there is an area that is impervious to > something like a 747 hitting it so you will be able to get the people out > through the stairwells. I don't know keep parachutes in the upper levels so > if the poor bastards have to jump they can make it. Who knows if they had > parachutes on the 50+ floors maybe we would have alot more living people. I > don't know. > I'm sure whatever they build will become wonderful in time. I remember alot > of people hating the WTC because they were so damn gawdy and they screwed up > the roads and were oversized and just like having a 6 carrot diamond > engagement ring, its nice but a little too gawdy. > > We'll see > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > EDIETS.COM > 954.360.9022 X159 > ICQ 417645 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:10 PM > Subject: Re: CNN/WTC was Re: CNN now charging for video > > > > The official reason given was that companies would not want to rent in > tall buildings anymore...sad. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:52 PM > > Subject: Re: CNN/WTC was Re: CNN now charging for video > > > > > > > yea these all are crappy IMHO. > > > > > > The one that had 2 63 story skyscrapers was nothing > > > > > > I mean I was expecting to see something dominating it just looks like to > me > > > they don't want to build something big again because they don't want > them to > > > be hit with jet liners again > > > > > > oh well > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > > Senior Database Developer > > > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > > EDIETS.COM > > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > ICQ 417645 > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
