There was also a decision a few years back that said officers don't have to tell you 
your Miranda rights anymore, because everyone should know them, they are implied.

Combine these issues together and I see a system ripe for corruption and civil rights 
abuses.  I wonder how long it's going to take people in this country to reverse all 
the bad decisions being made out of terror fear.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Lapd at its best -Miranda Warnings go byebye?


in custody and under interrogation...

At 01:50 PM 12/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I always thought Miranda warnings were only given to those under arrest.
>This article says they are to be given to anybody the police question.
>
>Is this true, I ask because I want to know.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:37 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Lapd at its best -Miranda Warnings go byebye?
> >
> >
>http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/01/scotus.police.questioning.ap/index.htm
>l
> >
> >
> > Hrm i can't see the supreme court removing miranda warnings.
> > And its great how the LAPD thinks its can shoot a person 5 times then
>not
> > give miranda warnings lol
> >
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to