a money grubber :) ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:45 AM Subject: RE: Proud of UK
Personally I am tattooed, pierced, and considering a brand, or maybe some sub dermal implants under a tatt. So really I wouldn't care if he did it inside. Also like was mentioned earlier, if it is common practice to mark the organ to make it easier to find middle/left/right, and there is no S.O.P. for what kind of a mark to use, who cares? Tim -----Original Message----- From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:46 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Proud of UK So, do we get to call you a chauvinist pig, since you get to all women emotional? Come on Bill. How'd you like something mongrammed on one of your internal organs? -d ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: Re: Proud of UK > he very well might have done it for that reason. > > I mean if he was just being a sick F##k would he still do it knowing hes > giving a video tape to everyone?? > > And if they normally do some kinda of demarcation then the ladies need to > just shaddup and stop money grubbing now if he shouldnt have been writting > on their bits and pieces they shouldn't get damages cause no damage was done > but since they are woman we know how emotional they can get and they will > want tons of dollars for pain and suffering. > > Though it sounds kinda fruity for him to do that but i'm not a md so i dont > know > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:46 PM > Subject: RE: Proud of UK > > > I think he should have put a picture of a baby (like a stick figuire) with > a down arrow at the lower part of it... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephenie Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:45 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Proud of UK > > > Hmm, according to webmd: > Most often, the entire uterus is removed. > Removal of lymph nodes, structures that support the uterus, and the > ovaries. This is called a radical hysterectomy. A radical hysterectomy > may be done to treat cancer of the uterus or cervix. > > > > ~~ > Stephenie Hamilton > Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional > CFXHosting > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Proud of UK > > > that is only a radical hysterectomy (at least I think so, the partial > just removes the ovaries...dont hold me to that, but i think that is the > case) > > - > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 2/18/2003 > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5