Is the "once-proud" Star Trek franchise stagnant and in decay? 

Yes, according to a leading game maker. 

Activision filed suit Monday against Trek's federation bosses at Viacom,
accusing the media giant of running the Enterprise (news - web sites)
into the ground, and zapping fan interest in its videogame tie-ins. 

Viacom, in turn, says it's the gamer that's trying to trod on Trek for
the sole purpose of renegotiating a $20 million licensing deal. 

Activision's breach-of-contract lawsuit, excerpted Tuesday in a release
from the Santa Monica software manufacturer, is unusually harsh in its
assessment of the state of Star Trek, and even contains a spoiler. 

To whit: According to Activision, Viacom, which owns Paramount Pictures,
has "no current plans for further Star Trek films." 

Spoiler proviso: Studio sources say that while a new big-screener isn't
in the works that doesn't mean one won't be--Paramount, they insist,
isn't phasing out Trek. 

Paramount has released 10 Trek features, dating back to 1979's Star
Trek: The Motion Picture. The most recent was 2002's Star Trek: Nemesis,
the fourth to star the cast from Star Trek: The Next Generation, and the
first to fail to surpass the $50 million mark at the U.S. box office. 

To Activision, Nemesis' negligible performance wasn't a isolated
incident, but a trend. 

----------------------

Wowsies.
0_0

I mean...they aren't really doing much good things with the series...but
that's really a bit harsh ^_^
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/eo/20030702/en_industry_e
o/12085

-Gel



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to