Is it true, as the one editorial said, that the European nations are not being asked to sign such an agreement? If so that is trouble, there. I'd send a link but I closed that window hours ago and I really don't know anythng about the publication anyway. Just asking if it's true.
Dana S. Isaac Dealey writes: > >> *sigh* > >> I guess we are in for trouble. > >> For all you know we could be labelled the next terrorist > >> nation hiding Saddam. > > For no reason other than not wanting to simply roll over and give the US > unquestionable, unilateral power over other countries. > > I have a tough time understanding how the original author considers it a good thing > that the US ask for total immunity from the ICC... Which would then make the ICC an > engine through which the US can "stick it" to other countries. > > s. isaac dealey 972-490-6624 > > new epoch http://www.turnkey.to > > lead architect, tapestry cms http://products.turnkey.to > > tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi > > certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer > http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816 > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
