I thought commercial speech was advertising? As opposed, let's say, to the editorial or news page?
Dana Nick McClure writes: > The press is typically a company or corporation, it has been commonly held > that commercial speech does not qualify for the same protections as private > speech. > > Freedom of the press assures that while it is a commercial organization > what is prints is still protected. > > At 03:46 AM 7/7/2003 +0000, you wrote: > >what difference to you see between freedom of speech for the individual and > >freedom of speech for the press? They are both speech and the are both > >protected by the first amendment. If you are going to say that they are > >clearly separate because they are clearly listed separately in the > >language, then I guess there is no arguing with that. > > > >Out of curiousity do you consider the Patriot Act constitutional? What abot > >Patriot 2? > > > >Dana > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
