Constitution a few months ago that addresses just that situation -
letting a president serve as long as (s)he can be re-elected.
Obviously, Hatch brought that up as the side-product of some fantasy of
having Dubya in office indefinitely. He apparently didn't think that if
the amendment were to pass, the Shrub would have to run against Clinton,
which would be... fun.
- Jim
Matthew Small wrote:
>That's my postition as well... I like Clark, a lot, although I do know that we don't agree on all of the issues. I'm mostly concerned that we elect an administration that looks to benefit the people rather than itself.
>
><sigh> We really should just amend the Constitution to let Bill run again... maybe if we offered to also amend it to let Arnold run for Pres we could have the most amazing race in history - Clinton vs. the Prezinator.
>
>- Matt Small
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:06 AM
> Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
>
>
> I think in this case the Democrats are going to have to be very pragmatic
> and go for whomever is most likely to beat Shrub. As much as I agree with
> certain policy positions, I think that Clark has a better chance than
> Kucinich. Perhaps a Clark Dean combination would work.
>
> larry
>
> At 10:08 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
> >Those are also my first two choices, Larry. But on the thrid I go for
> >John Edwards. I'm a democrat all the way up til 9, then it's a
> >Libertarian Candidate.
> >
> >- Matt Small
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Larry C. Lyons
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
> >
> > At 05:51 PM 10/29/2003, you wrote:
> > >I'm sure this came up either in 2002 or 2000 as well, but it's
> > >SelectSmart's candidate matcher. You choose your position, it gives you
> > >a candidate.
> > >
> > ><http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/>http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/
> > >
> > >I'm a 100% match to an undeclared Green Party candidate, 93% match to
> > >Dean. :-/
> >
> > Not sure I agree with all the questions and how they were set up for
> > priorities, but here's my scores:
> >
> > 1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH -
> > Democrat (100%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Kucinich.html>Click
> > here for info
> > 2. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT -
> > Democrat (92%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Dean.html>Click here
> > for info
> > 3. Kerry, Senator John, MA -
> > Democrat (85%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Kerry.html>Click here
> > for info
> > 4. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL -
> > Democrat (83%)
> > <http://selectsmart.com/president/Moseley-Braun.html>Click here for info
> > 5. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO -
> > Democrat (80%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Gephardt.html>Click
> > here for info
> > 6. Edwards, Senator John, NC -
> > Democrat (79%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Edwards.html>Click
> > here
> > for info
> > 7. Lieberman Senator Joe CT -
> > Democrat (77%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Lieberman.html>Click
> > here for info
> > 8. Sharpton, Reverend Al -
> > Democrat (73%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Sharpton.html>Click
> > here for info
> > 9. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. -
> > Democrat (54%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/LaRouche.html>Click
> > here for info
> > 10. Clark, Retired Army General Wesley K "Wes" Arkansas -
> > Democrat (53%) <http://selectsmart.com/president/Clark.html>Click
> > here for
> >
> > I strongly disagree with Lyndon LaRouche's policies, and more strongly
> > agree with Clarke's.
> >
> > larry
> >
> >
> >----------
> >[
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
