There are myriad reasons to toss him out on his ass next year aside from
the economy.  I'd like to see a strong recovery very soon, since I'm
tired of having so many friends out of work and seeing my friends and
parts of my extended family struggling through this morass.

- Jim

Bill Wheatley wrote:

>LOL ohhh you think he's the best of everyone running for president. My
>bad, I thought we were talking about bizarro land or something.
>If shrub ran against the Brady bunch he might be the most qualified but
>I do not think he is the person for the job. Though I'm hoping the
>economy will stay in the toilet for another 8-12 months just so we can
>get this knuckle head out of office.
>
>
>--
>Bill Wheatley
>Senior Database Developer
>eDiets.com, Inc.
>(OTCBB: EDET)
>3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
>Deerfield Beach, FL  33442
>V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
>F: (954) 360-9095
>E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>W:  <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:23 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Bush resume
>
>
>You know, I hadn't applied that name to the democratic candidates, but
>if you
>think it is appropriate, who am I to argue.
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:11 PM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: RE: Bush resume
>
>  Hrm best of what bunch?? Maybe the best of the brady bunch but thats
>  just a slim win anyway
>
>  --
>  Bill Wheatley
>  Senior Database Developer
>  eDiets.com, Inc.
>  (OTCBB: EDET)
>  3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
>  Deerfield Beach, FL  33442
>  V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
>  F: (954) 360-9095
>  E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  W:  <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:45 PM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: RE: Bush resume
>
>  LOL.  And probably not too far off.
>
>  I clearly don't think that Bush is a great president, he just happens
>to
>  be
>  the best of the bunch.
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:25 AM
>    To: CF-Community
>    Subject: Re: Bush resume
>
>    I think "thinking big" is a large part of Bush's popularity.  I
>don't
>    think he has a clue about how to manage the economy (or give the
>    impression of managing the economy), but there were a _lot_ of big,
>  bold
>    "big picture" initiatives that were pushed through after the
>attacks.
>    War On Terrorism! (Swoosh!), Department of Homeland Defense!
>  (Shazam!),
>    PATRIOT Act! (Kerpow!), Operation Enduring Freedom! (Kaboom!).  They
>    were impressive feats of bureaucratic manipulation, but the economic
>    policies seem wan and uncreative.
>
>    Here's a check for $300 - have fun.  I'm cutting taxes, sort of.
>Oh,
>    uh, here's another check for $400, go get yourself something nice,
>ok?
>
>    It seems to me that the "Economy" as a whole is sort of rooted in
>    large-group psychology.  While I don't believe the president himself
>  has
>    that much *actual* control over the economy, I think his and his
>    administration's attitude towards it can play into the general
>    perception of how things are going and make people more optimistic
>  about
>    things.
>
>    - Jim
>
>    Andy Ousterhout wrote:
>
>    >And that is news to who?
>    >
>    >Presidents need to think big.  Short term fixes create a pendulum
>  effect,
>  long
>    >term changes have long term impacts.
>    >  -----Original Message-----
>    >  From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    >  Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:49 AM
>    >  To: CF-Community
>    >  Subject: Re: Bush resume
>    >
>    >
>    >  Nobel winners attack Bush economics
>    >
>    >  "Regardless of how one views the specifics of the Bush plan,
>there
>  is
>  wide
>    >agreement that its purpose is a permanent change in the tax
>structure
>  and
>  not
>    >the creation of jobs and growth in the near term," the economists
>  said in a
>    >statement published by the Economic Policy Institute.
>    >
>    >  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2735269.stm
>    >
>    >  ----- Original Message -----
>    >  From: Andy Ousterhout
>    >  To: CF-Community
>    >  Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 AM
>    >  Subject: RE: Bush resume
>    >
>    >  I guess all the economists are wrong too.  If it were not for
>that
>  damn
>    >Bush:
>    >      1   All of the world's ills would be cured.
>    >      2.  All of the excesses of the 90's would have retroactively
>    >disappeared,
>    >      3.  All of those BAD business people who quickly realized
>that
>  BUSH
>  was
>    >  lax on businesses would not have been able to implement evil
>  business
>    >  practices SO quickly that it appeared that they had been
>following
>  them
>    >since
>    >  the 90's
>    >      4.  Business would be ignoring the lower cost of labor in
>other
>    >countries
>    >  and would have continued to hire people who provided diminishing
>  value
>  for
>    >the
>    >  love of country(sorry, God's out)
>    >      5.  All of those foreigners who think that we suck would not
>be
>  risking
>    >  life and limb to sneak into OUR country voluntarily work for, god
>  forbid,
>    >  below minimum wage, and send huge amounts of their paltry
>earnings
>  back
>  to
>    >  their highly advantaged family who stayed home to live a life of
>  luxury.
>    >      6.  Yale's image would have remained untarnished
>    >
>    >  My bad.
>    >
>    >  -----Original Message-----
>    >  From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    >  Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 PM
>    >  To: CF-Community
>    >  Subject: Re: Bush resume
>    >
>    >    Actually the statement that the economy is in a turnaround, is
>  more pie
>  in
>    >  the
>    >    sky.  Jobs continue to be lost, prosecutions of those involved
>in
>  business
>    >    fraud, and securities scams are still running at a less than
>  enthusiastic
>    >  rate.
>    >    Our borders are still insecure.  Non-Mexican illegal immigrants
>  are
>  still
>    >    released into the streets after capture by the INS.  His energy
>  and oil
>    >  patch
>    >    friends are still not being called to account for their
>  mis-deeds. Our
>    >    reputation internationally has sunk to a historic low.  But I
>do
>  have
>  to
>    >  credit
>    >    him for this, he still has a fanatic following, and the big
>bucks
>    >
>    >
>
>    _____
>
>
>  _____  
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to