of weapons and training provided not only by Iran but Iraq as well.
I know some guys from 5th Special Forces Group that had something to say
about that though :)
I don't see us attacking Iran, unfortunately.
We'll get around to it one of these days.
--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:37 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
Just a point to consider, and one you neglected when talking about
terrorist support. Ansar Al Islam is a terrorist group that did operate
in Iraq. You neglected to mention that they operated in the US supported
Kurdish region.
So following your logic, shouldn't we attack ourselves.
Ansar Al Islam was supported by Iran. Yet I do not see us attacking Iran
any time soon.
larry
At 11:22 AM 12/11/2003, you wrote:
>Listen brother, you might not like the war, but remember, Saddam was given
>plenty of chances to simply disclose what he had, or didn't have. This man
>tried to assassinate a living American president. He supported terrorists
>and operated training camps within his borders. I didn't say Al Queda,
just
>terrorist. Ansar Al Islam operated feely within Iraq. Palestinian suicide
>bombers and their families received support from Iraq. We did not
>manufacture this war. If anything I think by moving now, before he really
>had a chance to rearm, we have saved American lives.
>
>
>He was bad for the stability of the region. He was bad for the world.
>
>
>Hell I truly hope little by little, say every decade or so, that we topple
>another dictator.
>
>--
>Timothy Heald
>Web Portfolio Manager
>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>U.S. Department of State
>571.345.2319
>
>The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
>Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
>opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
>unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:47 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
>Why should US companies benefit from a war manufactured by our own country?
>When organized crime does that it's called a "protection racket".
>
>-Kevin
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:32 AM
>Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
> > The countries in question can still do business with Iraq, they just
cant
> > bid on the contracts that the US taxpayers are paying for. They can be
>hired
> > as subcontractors for the contracts as well. I dont see why this is such
a
> > huge deal? Why should the US taxpayers pay french companies to rebuild
>Iraq
> > when they werent willing to support the US efforts in the first place?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:28 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >
> >
> > Former top U.S. officials are blasting the Bush administration for
>reopening
> > a rift with Europe by excluding critics of the war from prime contracts
>for
> > Iraq's reconstruction.
> >
> >
>
<http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>http://www.foxnews.com/s
tory/0,2933,105433,00.html
><http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> > <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> >
> > "I thought we were in the process of acquiring support rather than
> > alienating it," former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (search)
>said.
> >
> > So let me get this straight.
> >
> > 1. Economy is bad.
> > 2. Find a patsy country and accuse them of something unfounded.
> > 3. Get called on it by other countries.
> > 4. Attack anyway
> > 5. Deny reconstruction contracts to countries that wouldn't help in an
> > illegal war.
> >
> > And people are complaining? I don't get it. It looks like a perfect plan
>to
> > boost the economy by giving local companies big contracts.
> >
> > -Kevin
> > _____
> >
> >
> >
> _____
>
>----------
>[
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
