The hot chicks was on topic. The tech question wasn't. He violated list
policy. Sex only here!
Well, that and politics, so when we find lieberman in bed with sharpton, I
want it posted here first. ;)

> It is, you post was on topic for this list.... and I for one enjoyed
it....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Re:Hot Chicks and UPS custom tag from Ben Forta
>
>
> Sorry, I thought it was standard to infuse tech messages with off-color
> words in order to make it list-safe.  I'll remember to not do this in the
> future.  My apologies to everyone who received it.
>
> - Matt Small
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Michael Dinowitz
>   To: CF-Community
>   Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 12:42 PM
>   Subject: Re:Hot Chicks and UPS custom tag from Ben Forta
>
>   Ben's tag was written a while back and may not be up to date with the
UPS
> interface. It may be using older code on their site or may have values out
> of date. I'd check if there's an update either from Ben or from UPS.
>
>   As for your amusing attempt to cause corporate spam filters to go crazy,
> please remember that there are people on this list in the government,
> corporations and other places that really don't appreciate the humor.
>   Also, as many spam filters bounce the mail right back, I'll be cleaning
> this up. More unpaid work. Fun.
>   I have half a mind to sick the secret service guys on you. The other
half
> is thinking of duck taping you to a chair and let Ben B. pun you to death.
>   _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to