I don't see the reason for the brouhaha. Janet Jackson has breasts, now that is a surprise :)
Dana
> Just to get this back to where it all started...
>
> You guys being squicked is just a cultural thing. Sex between mother
> and son was considered normal in ancient Japan according to a
> documentary I saw a few years ago. The mother in caring for her son
> and preparing him to become a man would initiate him.
>
> Hey, now tell me that it's ok - we're just a sexaully repressed
> country. Then tell me why mothers are upset because JJ showed her boob.
> It's all a cultural thing.
>
> - Matt Small
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kevin Graeme
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Re:Superbowl Half-time clip?
>
>
> Well I'll admit that I was one that got squicked. But then again, I
> didn't
> participate in the original conversation.
>
> IMO a good zone of privacy between parents and siblings is at least
> one
> State away. ;-)
>
> -Kevin
>
> > I know, talk about reading way too much into something. I think the
> problem here is the apearance of "bed" in the same sentence as
> "mother"...
> just like Victorians used to cover tables completely, down to the
> floor
> because they had legs.
> >
> > Would you-all still consider this disgusting if the guy's mother
> were
> watching television on the couch instead of in bed?
> >
> > I agree that there needs to be a zone of privacy between sons and
> mothers... but I don't see that this necessarily violates it.
> >
> > my .02
> > Dana
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
