Heh, if you read the analysis of the page you'll see why too... It's written
in ASP.NET and the tool is calculating the values for the _javascript_, not
the actual content of the site.
http://www.georgewbush.com is
21% evil, 79% good
http://www.kerryforpresident.com is
66% evil, 34% good
http://www.peta.com is
54% evil, 46% good
(In looking, I came across http://www.kucinich.us/ which has a HILARIOUS
picture)
In short don't judge a book by it's cover... Or it's abstract numbers.
Hatton
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: FW: we're 72% good!
>
> Republican National Commitee:
>
> http://www.rnc.org is
> 63% evil, 37% good
>
> Somehow I'm not surprised.
>
> larry good
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:02 PM
> >> To: CF-Community
> >> Subject: Re: we're 72% good!
> >>
> >>
> >> Focus on the Family's website is 40% evil.
> >>
> >> CAPAlert is 62% evil.
> >>
> >> American Athiests is 18% evil.
> >>
> >> - Jim
> >>
> >>
> >> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> >>
> >> >according to:
> > > >http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/
> >> >
> >> >http://www.houseoffusion.com is
> >> >28% evil, 72% good
> >> >
> >> >ok...now the fun part...who comprises the 28% and who
> comprises the
> >> >72%? : ) > > > >
> >>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: we're 72% good! Andre Turrettini
- RE: we're 72% good! Heald, Tim
- RE: we're 72% good! Heald, Tim
- Re: we're 72% good! Critter
- Re: we're 72% good! Michael Dinowitz
- RE: we're 72% good! Heald, Tim
- RE: we're 72% good! John Stanley
- RE: we're 72% good! Bailey, Neal
- Re: FW: we're 72% good! Larry C. Lyons
- C. Hatton Humphrey