I guess we'll have to wait until some other people chime in comparing their
results :)
Hope Mindseye have already got all the candidates applications they wanted
because otherwise they might be a bit peeved that I've posted the source
code to my solution.
Spike
--------------------------------------------
Stephen Milligan
Code poet for hire
http://www.spike.org.uk
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Dinowitz
>Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 9:45 AM
>To: CF-Jobs-Talk
>Subject: Re: Mindseye test
>
>Hm. My list results are different than yours. I start with the
>first line while you start with the second:
>
>had,for,was,at,that,on,with,but,in,a,it,to,and,of,as
>
>was,had,to,for,at,that,be,on,with,but,in,a,it,and,of,as,not,the
>re,all,they,he,hi
>s
>
>Now you have me doubting my code. :)
>
>> ok,
>>
>> Here ya go.
>>
>> Haven't done any thorough checking for bugs, but it seems to work.
>>
>> http://dev.spikefu.homeip.net/mindseye/cfchallenge/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Stephen Milligan
>> Code poet for hire
>> http://www.spike.org.uk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil
>> >Robertson-Ravo [Team Macromedia]
>> >Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:14 AM
>> >To: CF-Jobs-Talk
>> >Subject: Re: Mindseye test
>> >
>> >keep your mind fresh ;-)
>> >
>> >Stephen Milligan wrote:
>> >
>> >>Can you share the code that caused you to come to that conclusion?
>> >>
>> >>In every speed test I've ever done for list vs array the
>> >array came out
>> >>faster by a factor of about 2 times.
>> >>
>> >>Now you've all got me kinda curious about this mindseye thing so
>> >>I'll probably give it a go :)
>> >>
>> >>Spike
>> >>
>> >>--------------------------------------------
>> >>Stephen Milligan
>> >>Code poet for hire
>> >>http://www.spike.org.uk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>> >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Michael Dinowitz
>> >>>Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:04 AM
>> >>>To: CF-Jobs-Talk
>> >>>Subject: Re: Mindseye test
>> >>>
>> >>>Actually, I've found through testing that looping over a list is
>> >>>faster than doing so for an array, especially when you take the
>> >>>listtoarray() conversion time into account. Also, why not
>create a
>> >>>virtual query and do a QofQ rather than using a real table
>> >and a bulk
>> >>>upload?
>> >>>--
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>________________________________
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
